xtc4
-
Content Count
590 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Recent Profile Visitors
817 profile views
-
Hey! I have never fed my lefty crew and have suffered because of it. 431 matches. Only 61% win rate.
-
Like I said, I do the e3 play sometimes. I definitely do it when I have some speed. There can be trouble from ahead, you can get long-distance sniped from hill as you back up into F3, or you can even get flanked if some fast red plays the river. At the same time, there are opportunities in different directions. You need speed to be able to flex straight back, sideways into 2 line, or sideways up the river as things develop.
-
Adam, someone from DHO should be along to invite you, if they haven't already.
-
Agreed -- hill still seems to be the priority with 1 line sometimes a good play depending on tank and team comps. Also agree that driving along the river to an opportune ramp can be profitable as the match develops. I'd only add that I occasionally play 2-3 lines depending on the circumstances. An early spotting run up the 3 line from the south can be helpful.
-
Agreed. Those 3 maps are good, the strats are good, and we will better execute with practice. I am still thinking about Prok and might make it a project to work on it further.
-
That's it! I am buying a value pack of croissants this weekend for my lefty crew.
-
Holsy reminded me of this thread, and I am reviving it because we restarted CW. Lots of good advice.
-
-
I might want to keep working on Prok. If we do the 1 line push, we definitely have to account for tanks double-bushed at the red line. I may have ideas.
-
-
-
That was so wrong. I hope your crew enjoyed the croissants and coffee.
-
i don't think I'll block anything. Even the maps I don't really like are . . . different. Sometimes on a long carriage ride it is a comfort to change positions and be bruised on another spot.
-
The "Improved" Matchmaker - MM Update Apr. 3, 2019
xtc4 replied to SGrant7's topic in The Ammo Depot
I liked mm in the small number of games that I played. BTW, there are no reasonable changes to mm -- or to any other part of the game -- that will substantially lessen blowouts. It is in the nature of ranged fire combat that advantages tend to snowball. You can look up Lanchester's Square Law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanchester's_laws Sometimes I get in a rampage on the WOT forum trying to answer everyone who complains about blowouts. Players have to appreciate that a match can be "close," even though a tipping point is reached and a snowball starts rolling that results in a lopsided final score. It seems like WG listens to invalid blowout complaints and makes stupid changes to the game in response. For example, simplified corridor maps seem like a futile attempt make the game more like ancient linear combat in which Lanchester's Square Law wouldn't apply. -
The closest thing to a "good" tank that I did really bad in is the tier 8 Pershing. It is interesting because I like every other American medium (and heavy) that I have played.
-
-
Type 4. I feel dirty.
-
Any tier 7 light. Lately the EBR.
-
Invite should be out.
